The other day a gecko ran up the leg of one of the nurses during morning devotion. He reached down to brush it away causing the startled reptile to shed its tail and scamper away. I was amazed on two counts: firstly by the fact that the tail detached instantaneously, with no tearing or tension needed, and secondly, after the tail had fallen off it continued to thrash around on the floor in a most energetic fashion for well over a minute, presumably to give the impression of being alive. I can’t help thinking that Eichel Hospital is now like the tail of the gecko, apparently alive but really operating in a headless fashion.
Sadly Dr Antoine is no leader. His problems start with the language barrier. Despite being in PNG for five months now, his English and his Tok Pisin are still very poor, sadly. His communication difficulties are compounded by his tendency to think rather tangentially, which often means that you are unsure that he has understood what you are saying. To give an example, one of the nurses complained in the handover report that the security guard was nowhere to be found and they had had a confused, psychotic patient trying to break into the hospital and drag a tree into one of the wards. The nurses had had to fend him off themselves, which they did successfully, but they were rather shaken up by the event and upset that the security guard had not been around. Dr Antoine’s first response was to ask if the man was still here because he would like to see him. However, when rendered in broken Pidgin it gave the impression that he had not understood at all. After all, the nurses’ problem was the lack of security. Eventually it transpired that what Dr Antoine was trying to say was that if the patient was mentally ill then he should be found and treated, quite a sensible thing to say. However, had he started by addressing the nurses’ concerns and then moved on to the medical message he would have carried them with him. As it was, I think his message fell on half-open ears as the nurses were more interested making sure they had reliable security. When motivated and guided properly, the nurses are capable of excellent work. However, when a guiding hand is not present they tend to lose their drive and focus. I can’t help but notice that since Dr Elisabeth’s departure the attendance at morning handover has become rather sporadic, not helped by the fact that sometimes Dr Antoine himself wanders off halfway through it.
The communication with patients is also pretty haphazard. The villagers are often too polite or too scared to show that they do not understand so they will almost invariably nod as you talk to them. It is only by looking at the expression in their eyes that you can tell whether they really understand or whether they are just humouring you. Dr Antoine seems oblivious of this and I can only imagine what his ward rounds must be like. Maybe the nurses translate what he says for every patient, though sometimes they do not understand what he is saying either so this would not work in every case.
Most difficult for me personally is the third way in which patient care is impacted by this poor communication. It is impossible to have a discussion of any complexity about patients because Dr Antoine’s thinking either spirals off onto tangents or into repetitive eddies, and that is if you get anything sensible out of him at all. This means that for adult patients on the medical wards, the patients I feel most comfortable treating, it’s pretty much just me and the textbooks. This does not bother me too much as my pre-existing experience of treating adults with medical problems has given me a reasonable clinical judgement in this area. The problems come when I am trying to deal with patients who are not adults or have problems requiring surgical treatment.
There is a certain machismo about many Tropical Medicine anecdotes, with the heroic doctor bravely struggling to save a patient’s life, operating with one eye on the patient and the other eye on the textbook. What these stories fail to explain is that, in many of these cases, the doctor is operating only just outside his field of expertise and so the textbook becomes a reasonable aid to extend the doctor’s capabilities. However, when the doctor is firmly outside his area of expertise then he is bereft of the experience that gives him that all-important clinical judgement. If textbooks and the ability to read really were all that was needed then any medical student with a good textbook would be just as capable of managing patients as an experienced doctor. This clearly isn’t the case. The problem is that textbooks often outline the possibilities but are either not detailed enough in terms of the practicalities or do not assign any weight to the various management options, leaving you unsure as to what to try next. At this point, unless you have the backup of an experienced colleague, any further management decisions you take are little more than experimentation. Sadly at Eichel my backup is less than perfect. The case of the child that came in on Wednesday will illustrate why.
I was on call on Wednesday night and came to the paediatric ward to find that a 5 month old baby had been admitted with a distended abdomen. From the story it was pretty clear that the child’s bowel was obstructed, a relatively common problem in young children whose bowels can telescope in on themselves, a condition called intussuception. I have read about intussuception but have never actually seen a case so I was quite relieved when I came to the notes and found that Dr Antoine had already seen the child and written a plan. The boy was to have intravenous fluids, a nasogastric (NG) tube and to be referred in the morning to the mainland. I went back to the nurses to check the plan was being carried out and found that all that remained was the insertion of the NG tube. I had a few goes and then the experienced paediatric nurses all had a few goes. After seven attempts which all ended the tube going into the lungs instead of the stomach I told them to stop trying as the child was not vomiting and seemed reasonably well, all things considered.
I came back just before lights out to check on the child and he was still comfortable so I went to bed. The nurses did not call me until 7:45 the next morning when they burst into morning devotion to say that the child was vomiting yellow liquid. I came to the ward with Dr Antoine and Scholar to find the child much worse, with an abdomen that had distended further. In addition he was dehydrated because the drip needle had fallen out overnight and the nurses had had trouble getting another one in but had not called me.
Dr Antoine took one look at the child and declared, “We must operate!” “Don’t you think we should try an enema first?” asked Scholar a number of times but she got no reply as Dr Antoine had moved his focus to putting in an NG tube. Unbeknownst to me, the ward now stocked three types of NG tube (two weeks ago the hospital had only one type in stock) and one of the more rigid tubes went down quite easily. It was then that the recently-inserted drip needle fell out again.
Sadly the nurses had tried most of the baby’s veins during the night and, having been punctured, they were now unuseable. A series of increasing desperate attempts at inserting a drip needle began: at one stage three people were at various stages of inserting three needles into three limbs. The efforts of the staff were getting increasingly ridiculous but everybody was too hellbent on sticking needles into the child to answer my query about whether we should try putting a needle into the bone marrow (an option in children). I have never actually seen one of these interosseus needles done, maybe it really is a measure of extreme desperation and thus a ridiculous suggestion to make at that stage. I did not know and so upon receiving no response to my suggestions I shut up and contented myself with handing things to people who thought that they could see veins. I myself had given up a long time ago as i could find no viable candidates. Eventually Dr Antoine straightened up. “I will do a cut-down,” he announced.
Cut downs are a pretty archaic procedure in which you make a deep cut in one of the patient’s limbs to reveal the deep veins, at which point you can put a needle straight into one. They carry a risk of infection and they ruin the vein for future use so they are very much a last resort. Nevertheless, despite Scholar pointing this out and suggesting that we try and interosseus needle first, Dr Antoine appeared hellbent on doing a cut down. I chimed in, agreeing with Scholar but nonetheless we got little reply, just some mubling about how a cut down makes it easier to find the vein. In the end I figured that the best procedure was the one that he was most familiar with and so we started the cut down.
The procedure had all the features of a Dr Antoine procedure; carelessness, poor communication and the inevitable muttered, “This is very difficult”. I have yet to see him do an operation where he does not drop a piece of sterile equipment on the floor and snap the suture thread when tying knots. However, these are minor flaws compared with the fact that his carelessness means that he often does not plan ahead or make adequate provisions to guard against mishap and so it was with this cutdown, which just ended with a T-shaped cut in the child’s ankle and a vein multiply punctured because the iv needle had gone through the side wall. Subsequently I have looked at a textbook and the method they recommend, through it requires some dextrous operating, avoids the risk of making multiple holes in the vein. (You make a small nick in the wall of the vein with a scalpel and thereafter everything introduced into the vein is blunt.)
One ankle vein ruined, Dr Antoine shifted his attention to the other, at which point I protested ever more strongly that we should try inserting an interosseus needle, which Scholar said she had done twice. Of course, we don’t have the proper needles but you can do it with standard needles according to the PNG paediatrics guidelines. Dr Antoine actually responded this time but only to ask whether Ketamine could be given via the interosseus route. I know that fluids can but I was not sure about drugs, especially anaesthetic drugs, where the time of absorbtion and the distribution in the body is very important. I had to admit this and so he started on his second cutdown, which failed too. Scholar came and tried the interosseus needle but obviously hadn’t learnt the technique well enough because her attempts were unsuccessful.
So, after 5 hours of work, we had achieved little more than dehydrating the baby further by putting it under a hot operating lamp, damaging all visible veins and cutting into both its ankles for nothing. By then the administrator, who is the the only one who can organise emergency transport to the mainland, had gone to court (to defend himself in a rather ridiculous libel case) so there was no possibility of discussing transfer options. The child would have to wait for transfer to the mainland the following day getting ever more dehydrated in the meanwhile.
I accompanied the child on the boat the following morning. We hired a special boat to go an hour earlier than the normal ferry, with an ambulance to pick us up on the other side. I was not in the least bit surprised to find no ambulance waiting for us but after an hour of waiting (this is PNG time) I called the administrator and asked for the number of whoever was providing the ambulance. Sadly, the responsible clinic officer was was more interested in sleeping than working, judging by the confused button pressing that preceded my call being redirected to voicemail, and so when a PMV (bus) turned up I decided to use it as our transport. We reached Modilon Hospital without any further mishaps. I handed over the patient and slunk away as fast as I could, ashamed that all we had done is make it harder for the paediatricians to help the child properly. After leaving the hospital I met up with Dr Elisabeth, who was still on the mainland, dealing with a few final affairs (made harder by the fact that the province’s (country’s?) entire banking system has been crippled by a failure of the telecoms equipment). I recounted the sorry tale and as I did so she was continually interjecting, suggesting countless things that we could have done or should have done.
Given that the judgement of the person who is meant to be supervising me is often questionable I am disinclined to go and ask him for help, unless I have to. This in itself poses a problem and brings me to the next flaw in the whole “no guts no glory” approach. The one type of doctor who is worse than the one who knows very little, is the doctor who thinks he knows something when he does not. Buoyed up with false confidence he will end up making poor decisions and endangering patients. In the heavily-supervised Western healthcare system this sort of mistake is usually caught relatively early because most people’s work is checked by their colleagues at some stage. When that supervision is absent then the safety net is gone.
I was reminded of this rather forcefully when I saw a boy whose arm I’d sutured up unaided on the weekend that Dr Antoine was travelling back to Madagascar with his wife. The boy returned with his father, complaining, with typical Papua New Guinean understatement, of liklik swellap (a little swelling). The banadage was tough to remove but when I finally pulled the last turn free I was horrified to see pus gushing like milk out of the suture wound. The swellap in question was an abscess under the skin flap and I had to get Dr Antoine to come and drain it.
The problem had arisen because I had closed what is classified as a “dirty wound” too early. I had previously read that dirty wounds should not be closed immediately but had misunderstood the term “dirty wound”, thinking that as I had cleaned the wound thoroughly and put some iodine on it, I had transformed it into a clean wound. My error will seem terribly basic to anyone who has done any time in Accident and Emergency but I never did an A&E stint and the textbook that I read to try and learn about the management of cuts did not go into details about the definition of a clean wound and a dirty wound. In this case I was fortunate that my mistake will not have any long-term sequelae but it haunted me all week. The most important rule of doctoring is Primum no nocere (first, do no harm) and I had broken it.
I had already been quite nervous about seeing paediatric cases on call, as I feel bereft of the comfort of my clinical judgement. Children respond to illness in a very different way to adults, so when they don’t seem to be responding to the treatment I have instituted I am never quite sure if I just need to be patient or whether I have missed something. Seeing this child was a realisation of my worst fears and it sent me into a vortex of self-doubt. What about the other paediatric cases I’d seen? Were they surviving more through luck than judgement? I did not come here to experiment on people, especially not on children. My low mood was compounded by feelings of isolation as I have no-one here that I can discuss these complex matters with – Pidgin doesn’t allow for any nuance or subtlety so if people here wanted to have this sort of discussion will revert to their Tok Ples (local language), which I cannot speak. Furthermore this sort of ethical and conceptual discussion is not something that most people here seem very comfortable with*. I could not even get solace from those back home as the internet connection was down for most of the week.
So I was left with myself and my often ineffective pep-talks: “Pull yourself together and stop being such a wimp. None of your other Tropical Medicine friends needed to email you for support, did they? Don’t be so pathetic.” Having been in similarly isolated situations before, I knew that I had to fill my evenings will relentless activity so I wouldn’t have time to wallow in self-pity and self-criticism. Fortunately, my sister-in-law had been talking about needing a new logo and I decided to focus on trying to design one. My nervous energy transmuted into an unexpected but totally delightful burst of creativity, which resulted in, amongst other things, the much improved logo for this page. My mood started to improve and the final turnaround came on Thursday night.
I was standing in line to buy tea from the hospital store when a nursing student called me away. “Emergency, dokta.” “Wanem emergency?” “Snekbite.”
As we hurried to the ward I couldn’t help marvel at my luck. The snakes on Silsil must be angry because this was the fifth snakebite this week. They go to the surgical ward so I don’t normally see them but my ward round had been interrupted the previous day by an anxious nurse coming to ask me how to give anti-venom. Apparently in the past Dr Elisabeth had always adminstered the anti-venom but Dr Antoine had just written it up and walked off and, as is often the case, he was nowhere to be found. I looked in the textbooks, talked to Scholar and determined that it the only special measure was that it had to be given slowly because there is a risk of anaphylaxis, a severe (and sometimes fatal) allergic reaction, when giving the drug. I gave the anti-venom uneventfully and mentally filed away all I’d learnt about snakebite and what signs to look for when trying to determine whether the bite had been poisonous. Now it looked like all that information was going to come in very useful.
Even if I hadn’t read the guidelines I think I would have suspected envenomation. Even from the end of the bed, it was clear that this man was seriously unwell. All trepidation and doubt fell away, there was no time for that. The experience gained from years of treating sick adults made the initial stages automatic. Airway, breathing, circulation. The heart rate was slow at 40 beats per minute. I started giving instructions to the nurses: “Check the blood pressure. Get me a big drip needle and some fluids. Matron please go and find the keys to pharmacy and get the polyvalent anti-venom from the fridge. Lavlene, please draw up 200mg of hydrocortisone.” Back to the patient. Carry on assessing him for other signs that venom had reached the circulation. “Joe are you feeling any pain? Have you vomited? Does anywhere feel numb?” His legs felt numb. There was now absolutely no doubt that venom was in his system.
The nurses were working smoothly and efficiently, galvanised by the emergency in front of them. The hydrocortisone came, shortly followed by the all important anti-venom. I sat by the patient with the syringe squeezing in small amounts every minute or so, whilst continuing to guide the nurses. Everything was going well except, even as I was giving the anti-venom, the patient’s heart rate and blood pressure continued to drop. His heart rate was now 36 beats per minute, worryingly close to a cardiac arrest, and his blood pressure had dropped to a horribly low 70/40 despite all the fluids that were running into both arms.
How long would the anti-venom take to work and what was an adequate dose? The guidelines in the books and the leaflet that came with the bottle of anti-venom talked about giving the whole vial but yesterday Dr Antoine had only prescribed 5ml for one his patients, whilst Scholar had talked about giving 10ml. I’d already given 10ml but nothing seemed to have happened. I decided that giving too much was better than giving too little so started infusing another 5ml. Still not much effect. “Please go to to the emergency box and get the adrenaline,” I asked one of the nurses. We had no facilities for monitoring the patient’s heart rhythm or delivering an electric shock if his heart stopped, so I wanted to avoid a cardiac arrest at all costs. If things got much worse i would start giving him small doses of adrenaline to try and maintain his blood pressure and heart rate. I had just finished drawing up the adrenaline when blotches appeared on the patient’s chest and he started vomiting blood. He was having the much-dreaded anaphylaxis (compounded by poor clotting due to the venom).
Thankfully the mainstay of treatment is adrenaline, which I had in my hand. I followed this with a few more drugs to calm the vomiting and the itchy weals. With this treatment the patient seemed to improve, his pulse and blood pressure rising. However, his tongue still seemed a bit swollen and the oxygen saturation monitor started showing that his oxygen levels were dropping. I suspected this was probably an error, as the patient’s hands were cold which makes the machine give a falsely low reading but it was better to be safe than sorry and we got the oxygen cyclinder. This was great, except there was no mask. The normal way oxygen is given on the wards here is via a small tube inserted into a single nostril. This is not ideal as it only delivers a low concentration of oxygen and, furthermore, it irritated the now semi-conscious patient who kept pushing it away. I insisted on a mask, which, to my consternation, caused some debate as to whether we had any oxygen masks at all. However, eventually one was found and a little while later, as the patient’s hands warmed up, the reading on the machine returned to normal. We could relax.
This was an important case for me for two reasons**: firstly, it was quite amazing to see the nurses working so efficiently and made me realise what a difference proper motivation makes to their work (their motivation in this case came from the recognition of the emergency, not from anything I did) and secondly, it was a perfect contrast to the fiasco of the little boy with intussuception. It showed that I can be useful out here, over and above just treating the patients in a kind and thoughtful way, but I do need to work in an environment where I can get sensible support when I stray outside of my areas of expertise, because I am not happy to blindly stumble through the management of patients, hoping that I did not miss a relevant chapter in the textbook. Seeing this with clarity helped me make a decision I have been pondering for the last fortnight: in a week’s time I wil go to Braun Memorial Hospital, another Lutheran Hospital staffed by some of the German doctors I met when I first arrived. Not only will I have more medical support but also people to discuss things with and the pleasure of seeing a hospital whose history I have read much about.
So, after leaving Silsil next Monday, I will travel overland to the Birmingham of PNG, a town called Lae. From there I will catch a boat to Finschafen. The hospital is actually on the mainland but you have to go by boat because no road connects it to the outside world.
It sounds interesting, doesn’t it?
*The closest that I’ve heard to a discussion of the abstract is when people stand up and give sermons in morning devotion. Most of the time they are in Pidgin and I am afraid to say that I do not always make the effort to mentally translate them but there was one delivered in English the other day. The sermon was on a reading from the beginning of the Gospel according to John (”In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God” etc). The sermon started conventionally enough with the speaker talking about the power of the word of God and what it can do when it enters a person. However, I was surprised to hear him explain that the way it works is that the word of God enters the body and goes to the bone marrow, because that is the place where blood is made. From there it can then go all round the body. Based on this, I wonder whether the abstract is often made concrete for the purposes of discussion.
**Well, three reasons actually. The third reason is that I get a tale, where I can cast myself as the heroic doctor, saving lives with one eye on the patient and the other eye on the textbook. You wouldn’t believe this was a proper Tropical Medicine blog otherwise, would you?